<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>philanthropy-management.com</title><description>philanthropy-management.com - Blog</description><link>http://philanthropy-management.com/rss.aspx?b=95</link><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>Made to measure?</title><description>The need to demonstrate effectiveness and efficiency should not take precedence over the imperative to judge each philanthropic
 effort on its own merits.</description><link>http://philanthropy-management.com/news/Impact/Made_to_measure_.aspx</link><author>Richard Schwartz </author><pubDate>12/27/2012 9:57:26 AM</pubDate></item><item><title>Virtue's middlemen</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Philanthropy - essentially the use of private money for public
 good - is hardly a new idea. Like ice cream, however, it comes in
 more and more exotic flavours. Over the past decade, several books,
 among them Philanthrocapitalism (Green &amp;amp; Bishop)
 and Creative Philanthropy (Anheier &amp;amp; Leat) have
 sought to identify the trends that are pushing the process of
 giving in new directions.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://philanthropy-management.com/news/Impact/Virtue_s_middlemen.aspx</link><author>Richard Schwartz </author><pubDate>6/29/2012 11:23:27 AM</pubDate></item><item><title>Coming to terms</title><description>&lt;p&gt;There are some cynics who suggest that philanthropists cannot
 use the market to correct ills that the market itself has
 exacerbated. In some respect, however, that is naiveté disguised as
 cynicism. &lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://philanthropy-management.com/news/Impact/Coming_to_terms.aspx</link><author>Richard Schwartz </author><pubDate>6/28/2012 3:09:32 PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>